There’s almost a week to go until the end of September, but today really is #SOLS day. Today’s view from my pulpit is, once again, about transport. It’s too much of a theme.
I’ve written a couple of times in recent weeks about transport in South West London. I’ve never lived in any other part of the city, so I can’t comment on issues elsewhere. Although, as I noted, I commute into Britain’s busiest station, I feel this part of the world needs more attention.
South London is woefully underserved by the London Underground, with 250 stations north of the Thames and just 29 south. So, for those of us in the South West, the major transport options are mainline services into London Waterloo; trams if you’re heading around Croydon; or the “misery” Northern Line2 through to the City or West End.
Back in 1974, I don’t think I could point to London on a map (being about 4 years old at the time), but somebody, somewhere, decided that about 50 years later a Chelsea-Hackney underground line might be a good idea and started a process that has led to this day.
The Draft Mayor’s Transport Strategy 2017 includes a plan for Crossrail 2: a line that is described as
a new proposed railway linking the national rail networks in Surrey and Hertfordshire via an underground tunnel through London 4
The line is predicted to allow 270,000 more people to travel into central London during the morning rush hour. This is equivalent to about 10% of the current capacity into London. It’s really quite a lot.
The scheme will also “unlock 200,000 new homes”5. That also seems like a big number, equating to a lot of new houses. But it also seems like room for a lot of new people, because we need houses for London’s growing population. If a good proportion of these new houses are near the Crossrail 2 route, then it should be assumed that some of the people will utilise the route for their commute; after all, why not take the shiny new trains into the office?
So, if each of those houses has at least one occupier and half of those people use the new train for a commute, then we have 100,000 additional south-west journeys. Much of the new capacity is used up instantly. And assuming single-occupancy properties seems on the conservative side, don’t you think?
I love that, years ago, people thought 50 years ahead and started making plans. I love the fact that the Mayor is promoting the project as a strategic plan. But is it enough?
Footnotes
1 http://londonist.com/2016/03/alternative-names-for-london-s-tube-lines, Croydon Advertiser
2 Take The Drain, The Misery Line, Then The Viking Line, Londonist
3 Crossrail, History
4 What is Crossrail 2?
5 The Importance of Being Earnest: Making the case for Crossrail 2, London Reconnections
#SOLS
#SOLS is a project to get me writing on this site in 2017. You can read more about it in an entry from the start of the year. Recently, a few of the pieces have been about transport in South West London but can also see what else I have written about in the #SOLS index.

